![]()
Course No. IPR-11 |
Who owns tribal stories? Who owns the traditional knowledge of native peoples? What information can a tribe post to its website? Can our genes be patented? Does the tribe have bootlegged or pirated copies of software on its computers? Do the reading materials for courses in the tribal college and high school violate any laws? What is the tribe’s liability for copyright violations? The intellectual property issues confronting tribal decision-makers are more varied and more complex than for most businesses. On one hand tribes need to protect their stories, knowledge, and symbols but on the other, indigenous peoples are generally opposed to the notion of calling these parts of their heritage property. This workshop, intended for tribal council members, tribal attorneys, cultural resource managers, economic development staff, school administrators and information technicians, answers these questions, introduces traditional concepts of intellectual property, and outlines alternative approaches to protect tribal resources. |
Who Should Attend: Tribal Council Members, Attorneys, Cultural Resource Managers, Planners, Economic Development Staff, School Administrators, and Information Technology Personnel |
| Faculty: Mervyn L. Tano; Russel Barsh; Dr. David Stephenson |
Course No. IPR-12 |
In the world of new biomedical research, indigenous genetic materials have become a "hot commodity". Whether for genetic diversity studies to prove or disprove world migration patterns, or for silver-bullet pharmacogenetic wonders, the genomes of indigenous groups, which are often viewed as isolated relics of pre-historic man, are sought after and deemed essential to the progression of modern, scientific understanding. Often, a moral argument biased toward unfettered research emerges in which indigenous peoples who are protective of their genetic materials are admonished to participate in research studies of uncertain quality to benefit all of mankind. Ethical standards for research and ownership over specimens and results are most difficult to establish in cases with the potential for financial gain or academic notoriety. Indigenous groups more often than not find themselves participating in projects with questionable research methodology and little or no substantial compensation for the loss of ownership and future access to specimens and research products. The workshop will explore the relationship between current regulatory mechanisms within the Intellectual Property Rights regime, indigenous common law practices concerning use and transfer of Traditional Knowledge and material resources, and indigenous notions of property, sacredness, and cultural identity and autonomy. |
| Who Should Attend: Tribal Council Members, Attorneys, Natural and Cultural Resource Specialists and Environmental Protection Professionals and Federal Agency Personnel and Contractors Working in Indian Country |
| Faculty: Mervyn L. Tano; Russel L. Barsh; Dr. David Stephenson |
Course No. IPR-13 |
|
Who Should Attend: Decision-makers and Staff of Community-Based, Grassroots Organizations and Indian Tribes, Attorneys, Natural and Cultural Resource Specialists and Environmental Protection Professionals and Federal Agency Personnel and Contractors Working on NEPA Issues |
| Faculty: Mervyn L. Tano; Russel L. Barsh |